However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban. It might help for a short period of time. On the other handsmoking can be useful to put a person into easespecially when a person is feeling overwhelmed over work and needs to let the stress out.
The tobacco industry also employs tens of thousands of people throughout the world, particularly in poorer countries like Zimbabwe or India. Anyone around them can develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sites in the body.
It is simply not fair to impose this upon another person. It has become fashionable in the world today to condemn smoking. Write at least words. There is also concern today about passive smoking. Without cigarettes, these people would have no jobs.
For instancewhen a person smokes full bucket in one dayhe or she would definitely suffers from health issues such as unusual coughingdifficulty in swallowing. Such aspublic places like markets and streets.
A further point is that governments throughout the world make huge profits from levying taxes on cigarettes. Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. SoSmokers will force people to be indoors instead of outdoors.
Reply Fri 31 Oct, In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public places.
For examplewhen a person works in long shift hourssmoking a cigarette could be the only way out through out the day. In conclusionSmoking should be prohibitedat least some of the places where families gather around like park. Howeverthe pleasure that comes out from smoking one cigarette into another will bite her or him on the back in the near future and they have to be responsible for their own actions.
SoPeople should be aware of the outcomes. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Should smoking be banned completely? They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
A further issue is that smoking costs governments millions of pounds because of the large number of people who need treatment in hospitals for smoking related problems. However, the decision as to whether to smoke or not should be for each individual to make. For some, it even improves concentration.
Model Answer Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. Should Smoking Be Banned?
I would also argue that people should have the right to choose whether they smoke or not.
People should not smoke in a room where there are non-smokers but surely they should be free to smoke elsewhere. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action. Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby.
This would improve the health of thousands of people, and that is most definitely a positive development. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where they wish.
Firstly, Smoking should be bannedbecause it harms the environment. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. If they would prefer not to smoke passively, then they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted.
Another examplethey have to avoid certain places. In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore.Mar 20, · Also, people refer smoking as slow death and it steals years of a person's life, which is really horrible and they should be aware of the consequences.
So, Smoking should be banned, because it affect the environment badly as well as their health. Firstly, Smoking should be banned, because it harms the environment.
If smoking should be banned because it causes cancer or kills people, why arent fast food restaraunts banned. They cause cancer. And what about soda, soda causes cancer.
Smoking In Public Places Should Be Banned There should be rules enforced for smoking in public places. Smokers just do not know the negative influence they are spreading. A puff of cigarette can harm a smokers health.
Therefore smoking should be banned in all public places. Smoking can be dangerous for those around the smoker. The social acceptance of smoking in public places demonstrates that many still do not consider secondhand smoke as dangerous to one's health as firsthand.
People should not smoke in a room where there are non-smokers but surely they should be free to smoke elsewhere. However, despite these points, the arguments against smoking are strong.
Smoking has been shown to be dangerous to health. SHOULD CIGARETTE SMOKING BE BANNED? Essay sample by my essay writing com. Introduction.
Cigarette, a long cylindrical roll of tobacco has been smoked by men for centuries.Download