The North should not have told the south how to do things. No one can arrive at a moral conclusion. Should he have fought for equality? Cultural Moral Relativism Now, if we were to press this issue harder, we may find solutions to the problems of merely personal moral taste by appealing to evolved cultural moral laws.
A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of God. Likewise, Hitler had a way of getting into the minds of his listeners with his speeches; he convinced many to do dehumanizing things to others.
Or are we simply expounding a mere preference, in which case all directions are equally valid? It is then, fairly compelling, that only within a reality in which God is known to exist and to provide objective transcendent moral laws, can we appeal to someone being objectively wrong. This is easily demonstrated for us by cultures who throughout history have had an immoral consensus view on various topics.
To put it in the terms of St. However, perhaps one of the most distinguishable differences between both Hitler and MLK was the very nature of their dreams. No one culture can legitimately criticize the moral actions of another culture. Some of his torture methods include putting the Jews into gas chambers, injecting cement into their blood, and dissecting their bodies while they were alive.
Is there an objective set of moral duties and values that make this fact known? Should Adolf Hitler have been stopped? Now, some mistake moral laws to be those that echo the laws of a justice system or vice versa, but human beings have had plenty of civil laws that were at one point or another, immoral.
Might does not make right.
Both Hitler and MLK encompassed strong emotional intelligence which they utilized in different ways to enhance their leadership, however MLK did so in an ethical way whereas Hitler most certainly did not. Since objective moral laws must exist, and the most logically consistent means by which they can be prescribed to human beings is through some transcendence source, it is fairly compelling to view these laws as those coming to us from the very mind of God.
Considered as a rationally justifiable set of claims about an objective something, [ethics] is illusory. Each of them had powerful words that could move many.
If the South thought it permissible to discriminate against blacks, and it is the result of their cultural moral laws, then no one should bother them. Although many of our common experiences have given us loosely agreed upon moral conventions, and therefore look to be objective, there is really no reason to think these to be truly objective since they are coming to us from ourselves.
Martin Luther King, Jr. Who in their right mind would pick Hitler as the better man? And why should another culture with alternate set of preferences have eventually conceded to his mere preferences if they were not ultimately rooted in an objective foundation, which ultimately spoke to and woke up their own conscience?
Would that of necessity change the moral laws under which everyone was to operate? In fact, reform would be a nonsensical term. After all, how else would we differentiate Dr. Where did the concepts originate to begin with?
In the evolutionary view, ethics have evolved too. If moral laws are dependant on personal whims, there is no rational way to do any moral deliberation, and rational thoughts take a back seat to personal desires.
And merely relative notions of right and wrong cannot give us any basis which can help us say that Martin Luther King Jr.
Their influential speeches had followers ready to get behind them to support their causes.It seems like an intuitive belief, but how can we rationally say that Martin Luther King, Jr.
was a better man than Adolf Hitler? Category: Compare Contrast Essays; Title: Thomas Jefferson Vs Martin Luther King Jr. My Account. Thomas Jefferson Vs Martin Luther King Jr. "It was illegal to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. Even so, I am sure that, had I lived in Germany at that time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers.
A Comparison of Hitler and Martin Luther King Jr. Show all authors. Jill L Content analysis was used to explore the rhetoric of Martin Luther King Jr. and Adolf Hitler, whose distinct motives play out over their careers and during crises.
Quotations from the speeches, essays, and books of Martin Luther King Jr. New York, NY: St. Martin. Malcolm X Vs. Martin Luther King Jr. Essay; Malcolm X Vs. Martin Luther King Jr. Essay Compare and Contrast the Work of Martin Luther King Jr & Malcolm X Words | 4 Pages.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were very significant during the Civil Rights Movement. Both were excellent speakers and shared one goal but had two. Compare and Contrast the Work of Martin Luther King Jr & Malcolm X Words 4 Pages Martin Luther King Jr.
and Malcolm X were. Compare/contrast two important works of the Tewentieth Century: 1. Adolph Hitler's opening section of Chapter XI: Nation and Race, Volume 1 A Reckoning, Mein Kampf 2. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s, Letter From a Birmingham.Download